
According to today’s NYPost, Mayor Bloomberg is planning on taking steps to cut down on alcohol sales in NYC and limit the public’s excessive drinking. Does Bloomberg not remember the phrase, “History is doomed to repeat itself”?
I can sympathize with Bloomberg about the nature of many NYC drinkers. Some (not all) are overindulgent and do not know the appropriate time to stop imbibing. Therefore, their display of intoxication leaves a terrible reputation that New Yorkers lack restraint when approaching a bar. However, we can analyze the cities where the majority of the population drinks, and we can see in a recent polling that NYC doesn’t even make the top 25. In fact, my hometown of Cleveland beats out the Big Apple (which is sad). If Bloomberg truly believes that drinking is such a problem, the last plan of action he should take is controlling venues and stores that sell alcohol. When the public is deprived of a commodity, they will use other means and methods to obtain that banned good. Prohibition led to the establishment of hundred of speakeasies, an increase in criminal activity and bathtub booze - which could often be deadly when made at home. When an item becomes taboo, it is desired to a greater degree and depriving the public of alcohol will only heighten their desire to consume it. The last thing NYC wants is another Temperance movement. And cutting back on alcohol sales will reduce the number of jobs available through the bar industry. During a period deemed as a double recession, New Yorkers need as many jobs as possible and the food and beverage industry has always been a major supplier of employment.
Alcohol and the history of our beloved US of A have deep roots and it is shocking to see the mayor turn on such an integral part of our society. If it were not for booze, the pilgrims would not have landed as quickly at Plymouth Rock (they ran out of beer on board the ships), we would not have had our first taxation (thanks whiskey), and there would have been a lack of venues to draft up our constitution (got to love taverns). And with this I say, “why alcohol?”
I’ve always believed in the power of education. I opted to pursue a Masters degree in food studies, focusing on spirits, in order to someday create a course curriculum to teach the younger generation about the positive influence of alcohol in regards to society and culture. Perhaps we need to reevaluate the manner in which we instruct our youth about alcohol in order to produce smarter and well informed consumers in the future. It is a substance that can be controlled and utilized properly. Teens and young adults need to be informed about BAC levels (Blood Alcohol Content), the effects of alcohol on the body, the strength (ABV) of different liquors, and the signs of being too intoxicated. It is with education that we can begin to combat this problem, not by doing way with the culprit.
When I was a child, I had a huge sweet tooth and my mom used to hide all of the cookies and candy on the highest shelf in our kitchen. Many children would give up hope of reaching the delicacies, but I decided to take a risk and climb on chairs, tables and shelves to reach the treats. Often times I fell in the process and wound up with bruises and cuts. Was it worth the effort? Not really. But did I want the sweets because they were forbidden? Absolutely. Had I known the effects that those confections would have on my health (mainly my teeth), I might have chosen an apple instead.
Bloomberg, leave our booze alone. Lets work on some of the other areas of NYC that need some sprucing up before you attack an industry that generates a large amount of tourism, revenue, press and popularity for your city.
(Image used from Joonbug.com)